
- Support for PLAYSTATION Network titles has been expanded.
Update: Al De Leon from SCEA added: "With this update, operation of the UMD™ (Universal Media Disc) drive has been improved to address cases in which the UMD drive occasionally suspends and fails to reload data. Updating the system software to version 3.73 will resolve this issue."
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
11-29-2007 @ 4:06PM
GoBob said...
This firmware was examined by DAX and Math and found to be a worthless update. See below.
http://forums.maxconsole.net/showthread.php?p=778395#post778395
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 4:07PM
GoBob said...
Quoting Mathieulh:
"After much investigations from Alex and I, we concluded that the 3.73 firmware is fully identical to the 3.72 firmware, the only thing that changed were the module versions and the index.dat/version.txt that display the firmware version. ALL the kernel and vsh modules are the same, so are the rco files.
As you know this does not really make sense and we have yet to find out why sony issued a new firmware revision when nothing was changed. Perhaps there may be some flaw in the updater itself that may explain this move, I don't think we will ever know for sure.
Also this the part when some "coder" gets greeted by noobs because of being so "fast" to port "his" custom firmware to 3.73 while nothing at all changed from its previous 3.72 version. I will let you all figure out who that might be...
UPDATE: lflash_fatfmt seem to have changed a bit (over 20 different bytes) but that's all we could find, no critical change and certainly does not need ANY patches to be modified/updated in any way to run a custom firmware, perhaps the bugfix is there (we are not sure of that yet, we are curently taking a closer look at the module to be sure)"
11-29-2007 @ 4:07PM
Mike said...
We need some info :)
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 4:09PM
GumbyX84 said...
It has been disproved. There is no difference between 3.73 and 3.72. People have already taken it apart and found that all the files are the same except for the file that contains the version number,
Dark_Alex finds official PSP v3.73 firmware is identical to v3.72
After investigation, Dark_Alex and Math have found out that version 3.73 PSP firmware is exactly the same as the v3.72 firmware, the only thing that has been changed were the module versions and the index.dat/version.txt that displays the firmware version. This makes little sense and nobody knows why Sony released a new version in which absolutely nothing was changed, perhaps they've given up? Read more here (Post #19).
http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=23201
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 4:10PM
GoBob said...
Lulz, I beat you to it. =D
11-29-2007 @ 4:21PM
merc25 said...
probably only meant for Japan, but it will probably be a boon for us CFW users, for it may mean some PS games will run (better).
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 4:46PM
Tim Parsons said...
I think i'll keep my trust in SONY before i trust to the word of some Piracy/Hacker group,.
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 5:12PM
GoBob said...
"PSP firmware 3.73 is now available via Network Update. Strangely, this update does not list any improvements before installation begins."
Well, technically Sony said there were no changes either.
11-29-2007 @ 7:09PM
Hashbrown_Hunter said...
They do not support piracy and all of the things they do are to prove a point. The end user is responsible for anything illegal.
11-29-2007 @ 5:22PM
Tim Parsons said...
a Firmware update with absolutly no changes? waste server space and effort for sometihng that just has a different version number?,. yeha right,. like that's likey to happen?
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 5:29PM
GoBob said...
Why do you think people are confused? Either Sony made a mistake, or they're up to something.
11-29-2007 @ 6:30PM
Da said...
@ Tim Parsons
don't be a narrow minded jerk. Dark Alex isn't a pirate, he is a hacker (but not a cracker, which is what I guess you think a hacker is).
Custom firmwares allow the user to play homebrew, something that shouldnt be locked in the first place.
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 6:48PM
Tim Parsons said...
It's SONY's product it's there choice what can and cannot be played on it,. make that choice b4 your purchase instead of resorting to these kinds of activities,. everyone knows Firmware users use it for Pirated Games,. the extras are just put in as an excuss/civer-up to that fact
11-30-2007 @ 4:20PM
p-diddy said...
>> everyone knows Firmware users use it for Pirated Games.
Tim, I'm an intellectual property attorney. I own no pirated music, no pirated movies, and no pirated games. I use custom firmware on my PSP-fat (3.52-OE) to rip and play my PS1 games on my PSP - all of which I bought at retail prices. I bought the PSP-fat after buying my PSP slim for the sole purpose of medium shifting my PS1 games - a practice that is done all the time when I convert music on a store-bought CD to mp3s or AACs for my iPod.
While I am not so foolish as to assume that everyone that uses custom firmware uses it for legitimate purposes, I take exception to the statement that firmware use it for pirated games.
-p-
11-29-2007 @ 6:32PM
Shinogu said...
I suppose it's just to keep up in numbering with the Japanese firmware update, which does have stuff to work with.
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 6:55PM
Dr Curiosity said...
I just reckon this is to stop people upgrading their custom firmware the current. Although I'm a newb to the whole "custom firmware" situation this is the only reason I can see.
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 7:03PM
GoBob said...
Maybe, but DAX won't make a CFW unless it's it's an update worth making a CFW of. There will be no CFW of 3.73. Someone made a CFW of 3.72, but it was a rip-off of DAX's 3.71 CFW, so it shouldn't be taken seriously.
11-29-2007 @ 8:33PM
pspdemoboy52 said...
My guess would be that they were making a new update and they accidentally published the blank one without editing it first. But what do I know? Nothing.
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 8:39PM
Nico said...
Where can I find more info?
http://www.spymac.com/details/?2312580
Reply
11-29-2007 @ 9:09PM
Tristan said...
IT says now that it fixes a problem with the UMD drive, well according to IGN.
Reply